All news

"The route was agreed upon in advance": a friend of Mikhail Pichugin, who survived 67 days at sea, reveals new details

The debate over the story of the Russian Robinson has been raging online for two days now. This is how 46-year-old Mikhail Pichugin was dubbed on the Internet. On October 15, the Angel radar detected some kind of "object" in the water off the coast of Kamchatka. The fishermen turned on the spotlights and saw a motorboat. Inside, an exhausted man was waving his arms with all his might and shouting, "Here, aaa!" It turned out that he had been drifting in the Sea of ​​Okhotsk for 67 years (!) on a catamaran carrying the bodies of his brother and nephew.

The family wandered around the Sea of ​​Okhotsk for 67(!) days. To survive, the relatives collected rainwater, soaked dried noodles and canned peas. Unfortunately, the 16-year-old teenager could not withstand the extreme conditions. He could not and did not want to eat noodles and peas and died of hunger. Soon after, his father died in grief.

"They died of exhaustion on September 18 and 28." Mikhail himself told journalists that he was already in intensive care. The tourist is currently recovering from prolonged hypothermia and dehydration in a Magadan hospital. In two months, he has lost 50 kg, half of his body weight.

"The patient's condition is stable," he said. o. Attending physician Yuri Lednev. - Receive treatment after consultation with all necessary specialists.

Local authorities promised to help Mikhail transport the bodies of his relatives and return to his native Buryatia. When he gets back on his feet, he will be able to see his elderly mother, 12-year-old daughter and ex-wife. It was the thought of their loved ones that made the Siberians fight.

Mikhail’s ex-wife Ekaterina shared her joy: “We were waiting for a miracle, and it happened.”

It turns out that the Pichugins had been planning a family trip for months. Mikhail, who works on Sakhalin, invited his older brother Sergei. He invited his 15-year-old son, who was staying with him during the summer holidays. (The teenager's mother lives in Krasnoyarsk.) The man readily agreed, as he dreamed of seeing whales. Even his mother's attempts to persuade him had no effect.

Sergey's ex-wife Natalya shares with a correspondent of "KP-Irkutsk": "We bought a motorboat "Baikat 470" and were told that it was unsinkable - then the vessel was registered and transported to the coast of the Sea of ​​Okhotsk. We stocked up on water, food, sleeping bags and a tent. The son went with his father's friends. They traveled from Ulan-Ude together, and Sergey himself also got there by plane, so they boarded the ship and on August 4, the three of them headed along the coast to the village of Moskalvo. Heading to Tar, only Mikhail went ahead, and two families with children were waiting for them on the island.

"Pichugin" regrouped on August 9, but sailed away from the shore and disappeared. Communication with them was lost. According to preliminary data, the tourist's engine broke. They tried to reach the shore, but the oars broke and the anchor was lost. So, the catamaran began to drift. The surprising thing is that, according to Mikhail, he and his relatives have seen helicopters flying over them and ships passing by more than once, but no one noticed it. Flashes did not help either.

"The first to raise the alarm were acquaintances who were also on vacation. They contacted the police on August 10. I learned about my son's disappearance two days later. The search itself began on the 14th. Rescuers from three regions worked on it, but stopped after a month, because they could not find any objects or boats. We wrote a statement and begged them to continue the search, but they did not listen to us.

Correspondents from KP-Irkutsk contacted one of the last people who saw Pichugin before the incident.

“We saw whales on the island and went fishing,” Denis recalls. “And on August 8, we returned to the place where we met Pichugin’s ship. We set up camp and the next day accompanied them on their journey to Sakhalin. I gave the boy warm clothes, and my wife gave me the remains of food, although she did not want to eat. And we watched them swim. In the evening, the Pichugins were supposed to come to the place and call, but they did not show up. The fact that Mikhail chose a dangerous route, as some experts claim, is a lie! The route was agreed upon in advance with the border service. No one thought that a tragedy would occur. Mikhail lived at sea for 67 days. Do you think he is ready? Yes, he was prepared inside and out. We will clarify the circumstances through an investigation and hope for a speedy recovery for our friend.

By the way, relatives noted that the Pichugin brothers had been hunting and fishing since childhood. Mikhail often went to the sea after work. This experience probably saved his life.

"I was collecting rainwater," the man recalls. "I was under a camel-hair sleeping bag. Wet and not dry. But you fidget and fidget and warm up. There's no choice. My mother was home, and my daughter was home.

Meanwhile, investigators continue to investigate the criminal case under Article 263 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation "Violation of traffic safety rules and operation of inland water transport." The maximum penalty provided for this crime is seven years' imprisonment.

The mystery of the disappearance of a man and a woman near Irkutsk has been solved after 14 years. Her husband is accused of genocide. (details)

Mother of Irkutsk student who survived rockfall in Altai: "My daughter has bruises on her face and a torn lip." (details)


Source: Комсомольская правда-DigitalКомсомольская правда-Digital

Loading news...

Loading news...

Loading news...

Loading news...

Loading news...

Elina Belyankina: „Es stellt sich heraus, dass es sich um indirekten Zwang handelt, ein Kind zu bekommen.“

Anfang Oktober nahm Russland die Verhandlungen über Sanktionen gegen kinderlose Russen wieder auf. Andrei Gurulev, Mitglied des Verteidigungsausschusses der Staatsduma, schlug die Einführung einer Steuer auf kinderlose Bürger vor und verwies auf die Notwendigkeit, die Geburtenrate zu erhöhen. Doch der der sowjetischen Praxis entlehnte Plan wirft Fragen zu seiner Wirksamkeit, Gerechtigkeit und möglichen Folgen für die Gesellschaft auf. Das Material von Realnoe Vremya erklärt, was die Argumente dafür und dagegen sind, wer davon profitieren wird und wie sich dies auf die Situation im Land auswirken wird.

Der Sprecher des Präsidenten, Dmitri Peskow, sagte, dass dem Kreml noch keine detaillierten Informationen über den Vorschlag Russlands zur Einführung einer Steuer auf Kinderlosigkeit vorliegen. Er wies auf die Notwendigkeit hin, die sowjetischen Erfahrungen zu analysieren, wo dieses Problem weit verbreitet sei.

Im November 1941 führte die Sowjetunion eine „Steuer auf Junggesellen, Alleinstehende und Kleinfamilien“ ein, im Volksmund als „Eiersteuer“ bekannt. Kinderlose Männer im Alter zwischen 20 und 50 Jahren und kinderlose verheiratete Frauen im Alter zwischen 20 und 45 Jahren mussten 6 % ihres Lohns an den Staat zahlen. Für diejenigen, die weniger als 91 Rubel pro Monat verdienten, galten ermäßigte Steuersätze, und Einkommen unter 70 Rubel wurden überhaupt nicht besteuert.

Peskow äußerte auch Zweifel an der Wirksamkeit dieses Instruments zur Verbesserung der Lage im Land. „Es ist unwahrscheinlich, dass diese Steuer Auswirkungen auf die demografische Lage haben wird. Aber diese Arbeit sollte von Profis erledigt werden.“

Die Idee, eine Steuer auf Kinderlosigkeit einzuführen, ist nicht neu. Im Jahr 2020 machte Tatjana Butskaja, Vorstandsvorsitzende der Allrussischen öffentlichen Organisation „Rat der Mütter“, einen ähnlichen Vorschlag. Sie schlug vor, es Menschen aufzuzwingen, sowohl Männern als auch Frauen, die „die Entscheidung, Kinder zu bekommen, bewusst ablehnen“.

„Um die demografische Situation in Russland zu verbessern, sollte jede Familie mindestens zwei Kinder haben, wenn möglich drei oder mehr. Und daran ist nichts Kompliziertes.“

Im Jahr 2024 brachte der Staatsvertreter Andrei Gurulev erneut das Thema Kinderlosigkeit zur Sprache und schlug vor, diese Steuer direkt zur Unterstützung von Waisen und Waisenhäusern zu finanzieren. Er betonte: „Was bleibt einem Menschen in diesem Leben? Das erste ist der Name, das zweite sind die Kinder.“

Erinnern wir uns daran, wie Wjatscheslaw Wolodin, der spätere Vorsitzende der Staatsduma, seine Kollegen dazu aufforderte, bei der Umsetzung von Plänen vorsichtig zu sein, insbesondere bei solchen, die einen öffentlichen Aufschrei hervorrufen könnten. Er warnte insbesondere vor vorschnellen Entscheidungen, auch bei der Einführung dieser Steuer.

Nach Ansicht der Russisch-Orthodoxen Kirche ist der Vorschlag zur Einführung einer Steuer provokativ. Dies geschieht, um die Verabschiedung von Gesetzen zu verhindern, die die Förderung der Freiheit von Kindern verbieten. Laut Pater Fjodor Lukjanow, Vorsitzender des Patriarchalischen Komitees der Russisch-Orthodoxen Kirche für Familie, Mutterschaft und Kinderschutz, zielen die Aktivitäten einiger Persönlichkeiten des öffentlichen Lebens darauf ab, die Souveränität Russlands zu untergraben. Dies bestätigt die Richtigkeit der Bemühungen der russischen Gesellschaft, sich vor destruktiven Ideologien und Subkulturen zu schützen.

Loading...
follow the news
Stay up to date with the latest news and updates! Subscribe to our browser updates and be the first to receive the latest notifications.
© АС РАЗВОРОТ.