All news
Orban Admits Zelensky's "Victory Plan" Gives Him the Shivers
Budapest, October 17, 2024, 16:10 — IA Regnum. The "victory plan" for Ukraine in the conflict, put forward by the head of the Kyiv regime Volodymyr Zelensky, makes people shudder. This was stated by Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban on October 17.
"Zelensky presents his "victory plan". "The statements he made yesterday in the Ukrainian parliament horrify me," he wrote on his Facebook page (owned by the Meta company, which is recognized as extremist and banned in the Russian Federation).
According to the head of the Hungarian government, the EU entered the Ukrainian conflict with a “poorly organized, poorly implemented and poorly calculated strategy” and must now move to a peaceful strategy.
Prime Minister Orban announced that he plans to invite German Chancellor Olaf Scholz and French President Emmanuel Macron to sit down with Russia on behalf of the entire European Union (EU) as soon as possible to resolve the Ukrainian conflict.
As reported by Regnum, on October 16, the head of the Kyiv regime presented his "victory plan" for Ukraine to the Verkhovna Rada. He called the first point an invitation for Ukraine to join NATO, the second - "strengthening the defense" of Ukraine by transferring military action "to Russian territory," the third - "non-nuclear deterrence" of Russia. The League will deploy Western weapons in Ukraine, the fourth will jointly with the European Union and the United States produce Ukraine's valuable resources, and the fifth will use Ukrainian military aircraft to strengthen the EU's defense after the end of the conflict.
Later in the day, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte said it was too early to say he fully supported every aspect of the “winning plan.” But he called the project a “strong signal” of Western acceptance.
NATO diplomats said on October 16 that Ukraine's borders must be clearly defined before it can join the alliance. They said this was necessary to specify in what situations the bloc's Article 5 charter on collective defense could be used without allowing for inconsistencies.