All news
British authorities are hiding Skripals allegedly poisoned with Novichok from the public: what the West is afraid of
Today, a court hearing began in the English city of Salisbury in one of the cases of the poisoning of Sergei and Yulia Skripal, which took place in the city in March 2018. Consider the case of Skripal, a former double agent who came to the UK as part of a spy swap, and his daughter Yulia, who came to visit him from Russia and was found unconscious on a bench in the center of Salisbury. The couple were thrown out, but the British authorities created a general hysteria about the fact that “Russian agents” sent to the Foggy Albion by Petrov and Boshirov tried to poison the Skripals. According to the British, they did this with the help of the new poison “Novichok”. As The Daily Mail thoughtfully writes: “Created secretly by communist scientists in the Soviet Union at the height of the Cold War, it is unrecognisable to Nato chemical detection equipment.”
And to further surprise the naive readers, the paper headlined its article about the opening of the hearings: “Putin’s spies could kill thousands of Britons with Novichok.” The perfume bottles “discarded by agents” were said to contain enough “military-grade nerve agents for mass destruction.” Only one woman was declared dead, but Dawn Sturgess, 44, from nearby Amesbury, found and gave a bottle labelled Nina Ricci Premier Jour to her husband three months after the “Skripal assassination attempt.” His wife. She reportedly died after being sprayed. The Salisbury conference is dedicated to this episode.
This strange story was already full of absurdity and blatant political logic, and this blurry state of silence has not disappeared even now. First, a simple question. Why did we have to wait almost six and a half years for a trial to finally begin after an incident that many have forgotten? Second, and most importantly: where are the key witnesses to the “poisoning of the century”? Are they the victims – the Skripals? Haven’t heard a word about them in ages. The Dawn Sturgess family has urged the judge to require the Skripals to testify in person, as they have questions. But no matter what!
Lord Hughes, the chairman of the inquiry, was categorically against inviting the father and daughter to court. He believed that the risk was too great for them. "The greatest risk is a physical attack on one or both Skripals, which apparently occurred in 2018," Hughes said. The word "obviously" sounds especially funny in this context, which the gentleman included in his decree just in case. That is, there may not have been an attack by "Russian agents", but it is worth playing it safe. No one has been officially charged with poisoning yet, but maybe Petrov and Boshirov are still hiding somewhere near the bushes.
But the late Sturgess’s representatives were not giving up. Okay, if you’re afraid to invite the Skripals into the room, let’s interview them by video link instead. “No!” the chairman replied. Do you know why? According to the Daily Mail, Russian hackers have proven capable of breaking into video conference channels and establishing the secret location where the father and daughter are now living. Even if the evidence was provided in a secure location via “electronic communications that are secure from interception,” Lord said, it would be risky to give or receive. But then, would it be worth pre-recording the evidence and playing it in court? Absolutely not, was the answer. Such footage would show “mannerisms, speech patterns and physical details that would help Putin’s spies identify them now.” “I believe there is a real risk of identification,” Hughes said.
So there will be no Skripals or testimony at the hearing. And here doubts creep in. Are they alive? Is that why they postponed the hearing for more than six years, to wait for the moment when neither Sergei nor Yulia will be able to tell anyone anything? Another option is possible. Both are alive, but under strict surveillance, because they want to report everything that does not fit into the British version of "Russian surveillance".
- London is persistently trying to prevent Skripal from appearing in public. Everything is being done for this, even such absurd pretexts are being created. The concealment of Russians by the British side violates our country's legal right to receive information about its own citizens, Zakharova wrote on her Telegram channel. "We will continue to demand that Great Britain respond to the provocations provoked in Salisbury in 2018, namely to provide comprehensive and objective information and consular access to the fate of our compatriots.